Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVeMi-0000K5-5U for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:22:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVeMg-0003QW-Tk for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:22:30 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVeMg-0003L1-I3 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:22:30 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVeMd-0002UD-LD for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:22:30 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xAFGMKxB029152; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:22:20 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: Andres Freund , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: SKIP_LOCKED test causes random buildfarm failures In-reply-to: <20191115011920.GA2614@paquier.xyz> References: <25294.1573077278@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20191106230111.2kmd6hnriqttw6ys@alap3.anarazel.de> <20191107013942.GA1768@paquier.xyz> <12732.1573145425@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5815.1573756664@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20191114201608.m763meogfkk6qpjh@alap3.anarazel.de> <10268.1573762809@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20191115011920.GA2614@paquier.xyz> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:19:20 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <29150.1573834940.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:22:20 -0500 Message-ID: <29151.1573834940@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > I would rather keep the solution with client_min_messages, and the > tests in vacuum.sql to keep those checks for the grammar parsing. So > this basically brings us back to use the patch I proposed here: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20191107013942.GA1768@paquier.xyz OK. regards, tom lane