Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m7rFw-0006PQ-4L for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 03:26:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m7rFv-00022Y-2o for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 03:26:15 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m7rFu-00022Q-N9 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 03:26:14 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m7rFs-0004Xl-Qx for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 03:26:13 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 16Q3Q27f029490; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 23:26:02 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Julien Rouhaud cc: Fujii Masao , Sergei Kornilov , "imai.yoshikazu@fujitsu.com" , legrand legrand , "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store) In-reply-to: <20210726013621.eznebns4boxoot4i@nol> References: <20200331073321.bhnx2p63gp5px37f@nol> <20200331184217.tf3x534uz4vusgmp@nol> <13923268-bad9-80f9-2542-5fd5e8b8c500@oss.nttdata.com> <42557.1627229005@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20210725163637.qkslpe24mgzen73t@nol> <81235.1627232375@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20210726013621.eznebns4boxoot4i@nol> Comments: In-reply-to Julien Rouhaud message dated "Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:36:21 +0800" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <29488.1627269962.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 23:26:02 -0400 Message-ID: <29489.1627269962@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Julien Rouhaud writes: > I attach a patch that splits the test and add a comment explaining the > boundaries for the new query. > Checked with and without forced invalidations. Pushed with a little cosmetic fooling-about. regards, tom lane