Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i9rGE-0007kb-57 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:41:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i9rGD-0003Ex-2j for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:41:45 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i9rGC-0003Ec-MO for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:41:44 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i9rGA-0002SJ-Jo; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:41:43 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x8GDffNI029553; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:41:41 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: pgsql-hackers , Michael Meskes Subject: Re: ecpglib major version changed In-reply-to: <48ee4c56-e1df-b39d-2cad-c7d80b120eb5@2ndquadrant.com> References: <48ee4c56-e1df-b39d-2cad-c7d80b120eb5@2ndquadrant.com> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:14:21 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <29551.1568641301.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:41:41 -0400 Message-ID: <29552.1568641301@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Peter Eisentraut writes: > The ecpglib major version (SO_MAJOR_VERSION) was changed in > bd7c95f0c1a38becffceb3ea7234d57167f6d4bf (Add DECLARE STATEMENT support > to ECPG.), but I don't see anything in that patch that would warrant > that. I think we should undo that change. Ouch. Yeah, that's a Big Deal from a packaging standpoint. Why would it be necessary? regards, tom lane