Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sORZL-00EIfH-IJ for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:40:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sORZJ-004s35-7d for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:40:25 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sORZI-004s2x-UH for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:40:25 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sORZG-004aBn-IS for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 00:40:24 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4620eHRh2969208; Mon, 1 Jul 2024 20:40:17 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Paquier cc: Justin Pryzby , Alvaro Herrera , Peter Eisentraut , Soumyadeep Chakraborty , Zhihong Yu , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Ashwin Agrawal , vanjared@vmware.com, Alexander Lakhin Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE SET ACCESS METHOD on partitioned tables In-reply-to: References: <202403261105.6o4ff4d6qagc@alvherre.pgsql> <202403211207.hfyirjweshbh@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Paquier message dated "Tue, 02 Jul 2024 09:23:19 +0900" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2969206.1719880817.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 20:40:17 -0400 Message-ID: <2969207.1719880817@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Michael Paquier writes: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 09:43:45AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Not sure that this is a must-have. It is nice to have, but extra >> information is a new feature IMO. Any extra opinions? > Hearing nothing, I've applied that on HEAD now that v18 is open. While this won't actually fail against a v10 or v11 server, it won't show anything useful either (because relam is zero for heaps in pre-v12 versions). Perhaps there should be a check to only add the extra column if server >= v12? regards, tom lane