Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WuqZQ-00014f-4i for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 22:00:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WuqZP-0006I3-Fs for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 22:00:35 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WuqZO-0006Ht-88 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 22:00:34 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WuqZG-0005ss-60 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 22:00:33 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s5BM0KGY029773; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:00:20 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Pg Hackers Subject: Re: view reloptions In-reply-to: <20140611194633.GH18688@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org> References: <20140611194633.GH18688@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:46:33 -0400" Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 18:00:20 -0400 Message-ID: <29772.1402524020@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Alvaro Herrera writes: > Is it too late to redefine the check_option_offset stuff before 9.4 > ships, so that it is in its own struct? We have a forced initdb already for beta2, so I'd say not. > 3) I don't have time to do the legwork before CF1 anyway ... but if nobody does the work, it's moot. > If we don't change it now, I'm afraid we'll be stuck with using > StdRdOptions for views for all eternity. Why would we not be able to change it in 9.5? It's a catalog change, sure, but we'll no doubt have others. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers