Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1if8K4-000612-AJ for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 20:11:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1if8K2-0003BX-Vz for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 20:10:58 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1if8K2-0003BK-NM for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 20:10:58 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1if8K0-0005uc-Is for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 20:10:58 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xBBKApPX002986; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:10:51 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Amit Kapila cc: Magnus Hagander , Andrew Dunstan , Mark Dilger , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test In-reply-to: References: <32745.1575303812@sss.pgh.pa.us> <7221b3b4-fc7f-404d-5cf6-830d3aa6800d@2ndQuadrant.com> <362bca0b-1c1c-c760-ab19-b5d9a14c69ea@gmail.com> <13003.1575391248@sss.pgh.pa.us> <25746.1575436347@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20102.1575675105@sss.pgh.pa.us> <30330.1575739251@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4412.1575748586@sss.pgh.pa.us> <9110.1575824266@sss.pgh.pa.us> <7254.1575993433@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Amit Kapila message dated "Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:18:24 +0530" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2984.1576095051.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:10:51 -0500 Message-ID: <2985.1576095051@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Amit Kapila writes: > I am convinced by your points. So +1 for your proposed patch. I have > already reviewed it yesterday and it appears fine to me. OK, pushed. Thanks for reviewing! regards, tom lane