Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qssxT-009vCN-Ja for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 22:54:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qssxR-00FD1g-IE for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 22:54:38 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qssxR-00FD1E-8V for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 22:54:37 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1qssxP-000zaw-Ct for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 22:54:36 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 39HMsX3w2995974; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 18:54:33 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Thomas Munro cc: Michael Paquier , Noah Misch , Vik Fearing , cary huang , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Add support for AT LOCAL In-reply-to: References: <2188264.1697425365@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2191749.1697427017@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20231016045804.c0@rfd.leadboat.com> <20231016055051.3a@rfd.leadboat.com> <2208907.1697435663@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20231016060510.72@rfd.leadboat.com> <2659915.1697521218@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2726901.1697556666@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2820407.1697561128@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Munro message dated "Wed, 18 Oct 2023 11:38:58 +1300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2995972.1697583273.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 18:54:33 -0400 Message-ID: <2995973.1697583273@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Thomas Munro writes: > Given that IBM describes xlc as "legacy" (replaced by xlclang, but > still supported for some unspecified period of time for the benefit of > people who need C++ ABI compatibility with old code), I wonder how > long we plan to support it... Should we be testing against xlclang instead? regards, tom lane