Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vScaB-001ztR-1d for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2025 14:51:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vSca8-00HMXf-0w for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2025 14:51:20 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vSca7-00HMXU-3D for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2025 14:51:20 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vSca0-003llG-23 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2025 14:51:14 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 5B8Ep6Ln2998352; Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:51:06 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio , PostgreSQL Hackers , Thomas Munro Subject: Re: Make copyObject work in C++ In-reply-to: References: <2844370.1765136707@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Mon, 08 Dec 2025 09:00:55 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2998350.1765205466.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 09:51:06 -0500 Message-ID: <2998351.1765205466@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Peter Eisentraut writes: > AFAICT, both gcc and clang support typeof in C++ mode as well. So this > kind of renaming could be confusing. Hm, if that's true then we should not have to do anything ... so why is Jelte reporting a problem? regards, tom lane