public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]>
To: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <[email protected]>
Cc: Maxim Orlov <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <[email protected]>
Cc: wenhui qiu <[email protected]>
Cc: Postgres hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 10:51:25 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
On 11/12/2025 22:05, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Dec-11, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
>> That's a great question and I've been wondering about it myself. It goes all
>> the way to the initial commit where multixacts were introduced, and I don't
>> see any particular reason for it even back then. Even in the very first
>> version of multixact.c, IMO it would've been simpler to have the writer
>> handle the wraparound.
>>
>> Álvaro, would you happen to remember?
>
> Sorry, I have no recollections of the reason why it was done this way.
Ok, I have pushed this. Thanks!
- Heikki
view thread (79+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox