Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1foTl6-0001C5-JU for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 13:16:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1foTl3-0000Gg-Dp for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 13:16:41 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1foTl2-0008Sf-4I for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 13:16:40 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-x241.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::241]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1foTkx-0006oR-Tu for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 13:16:37 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x241.google.com with SMTP id o11-v6so4468695wmh.2 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 06:16:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=2ndquadrant-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=b8hNRKgKY3PvCn/EVvyvFbCJKNe9ynCB33iAQ4rV670=; b=tbG/UDGREejcxFLpsM4ANIGJvSa/n2gstj8urZ/Z4eHsc5hD6JcoLicCFGqPys45DE tfD9MKq2qJmZ9rlT1TJI5zQHUfisswcUO+TM0B54TAo07wjAjTpQxSgLEHteVB0MDV49 oU13OFDVbc2Jw3Hb3NPWhjuSNeuC8Tyvw1bRgxaKNCucpgFySkxOnyao1oUZMHgrOZOt e/GddN7Ej+julNL/aX/KRF3imnuxoosm1qz2J1Gb5ExPlQRpVYLgeK0CrFzVN3NI/nKf DJ4IzYPb6ZeYxnIyzWE6d00Amt8um19yVhwSz/qv2ZVPF4o3rl6kHLtEMOv98/ubv4xv tSVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=b8hNRKgKY3PvCn/EVvyvFbCJKNe9ynCB33iAQ4rV670=; b=GfuRf/Wc/O8I+r5F7m+nLjrzNEcTDXRMeQXka2FlqosFWAiAvZmEZ0Se8J+O+xZO+N Lqz40HiCb4d1BY/8r4r8Kfo+NgRrmBH4D+mazx1lsdbgQbZWweayL2+RcW5VzyQ7NQJK HaMbBiGC/NsrEkescGVK2KulqwFhcN4fffEV0jEyQi5uW6sCVEF7oM/4yWoMOPors887 KCStrIfJYDqGxk+Mlg0Rg6Fn4UdX9xSZ0jIVUYf4yhvUUJ24oZKx+IuFx8tVFIQZltpM 9tvmGWMG5G/KlUo3AeHoOKg8mJLl2KBR/jUdTHoCuuoTzIfXqMT//KnE1p/4k3Njvqtf EN6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlH6n2Xrz7Uz3dDH5m7jqBI8Ep/XmRJMXcn5lNp2+/BmFqGzfa5S i5oLJwfpRc4pDzxPanKSRGPh+t9eMZFGW5nfdEF19+D40Jt8RmDEJu6SCPk6WaVAWV9tmfl64gu AR15q+obsrAWno+GB/oDcsOkYkkCyu236ft8HC9MZ5prcXrDveSD0lcDr+lqd5JkfqA2mSvylmJ O1stJW91S/wtZX5gCSB04= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPwNLngBUQd5yX4SMAwEF8iQZb85SuacT2VUglfjJdXoUWYpIVN+cjtYH4quqYMv7ru6K1v2SQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:5f82:: with SMTP id t124-v6mr3976652wmb.14.1533993394113; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 06:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.137.2.19] (ip-78-102-97-226.net.upcbroadband.cz. [78.102.97.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y33-v6sm8755793wmh.37.2018.08.11.06.16.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Aug 2018 06:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes To: Tom Lane , Peter Geoghegan Cc: Andres Freund , PostgreSQL Hackers References: <12259.1532117714@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20180720202450.zcakbvyqksschz5e@alap3.anarazel.de> <20180725230736.nscpb5ad2tl64nez@alap3.anarazel.de> <27669.1533782451@sss.pgh.pa.us> <465.1533955530@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1368.1533956577@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tomas Vondra Message-ID: <2e674bd6-3bc2-9d70-7d03-db48f7ea5877@2ndquadrant.com> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 15:16:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1368.1533956577@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 08/11/2018 05:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Geoghegan writes: >> I'm concerned that this item has the potential to delay the release, >> since, as you said, we're back to the drawing board. > > Me too. I will absolutely not vote to release 11.0 before we've > solved this ... > Not sure. I can easily reproduce that on REL_10_STABLE, so it's not a new issue specific to 11.0. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services