Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5NFQ-0007Zm-9l for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 06:59:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5NFN-0007un-Qa for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 06:59:25 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5NFN-0007uf-I9 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 06:59:25 +0000 Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5NFK-0007V3-Ly for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 06:59:24 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CD93200940 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 02:59:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 02:59:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=PByoUEtR1K9Ak3x7cw4ns1IL9abmE5APqpJcdUQdn zY=; b=NjZrFaBTFYvBwsyBcV60wNucmY5oAWlaAqRiBRzQe1QaBOT94MBwgakrI 7U9cGZlPRgVprhts+wgrtdYpznwGHUcm2vlVnaNv5T95t38ifutc9zVZSCwA29fX V6v2/VgwVqZPskzE+8IXVNLZPU81pncHdAsXFjQyrKda7U8Vu12IOxHambGpfgLf u19pWlltEaXwzOMEUs5TnaLkcz78QvQJYm1Fn0tO7vkfwQ30c7Z0ovoJQtWUazfn ekMKgsXf5FuMpwxjP62z4F6z0eEBnDVJyuRINFOeBiyu7lhtS5o9TvRpf8hX1h/t PZMa3gytneXj6eIblypu16grdQW3Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdelgddutdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuhffvfhfkffgfgggjtgfgsehtje ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefrvghtvghrucfgihhsvghnthhrrghuthcuoehpvghtvghr rdgvihhsvghnthhrrghuthesvghnthgvrhhprhhishgvuggsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeffhffhueekteeltefhveekvdefheeugedvkeejfffgudfggfdvtdefhffh hefgfeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hpvghtvghrrdgvihhsvghnthhrrghuthesvghnthgvrhhprhhishgvuggsrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 02:59:19 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: automatically generating node support functions From: Peter Eisentraut To: pgsql-hackers References: Message-ID: <2f876203-7142-fa71-6d22-6ce00eb26869@enterprisedb.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 08:59:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 07.06.21 22:27, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I wrote a script to automatically generate the node support functions > (copy, equal, out, and read, as well as the node tags enum) from the > struct definitions. > > The first eight patches are to clean up various inconsistencies to make > parsing or generation easier. Are there any concerns about the patches 0001 through 0008? Otherwise, maybe we could get those out of the way.