Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nXPhL-0004Eq-Du for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:48:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nXPhK-0004d2-AW for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:48:26 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nXPhK-0004bH-10 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:48:26 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nXPhH-0006cj-Qs for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:48:24 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 22OFmLtg3014853; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:48:21 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Simon Riggs cc: Robert Haas , Peter Eisentraut , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: Parameter for planner estimate of recursive queries In-reply-to: References: <91533bcd-c3a3-5844-7449-43aceede2117@enterprisedb.com> <2770446.1648056989@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2796462.1648067136@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Simon Riggs message dated "Thu, 24 Mar 2022 10:32:00 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3014851.1648136901.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:48:21 -0400 Message-ID: <3014852.1648136901@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Simon Riggs writes: > On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 20:25, Tom Lane wrote: >> Do you have any objection if I rename the GUC to >> recursive_worktable_factor? That seems a bit clearer as to what >> it does, and it leaves more room for other knobs in the same area >> if we decide we need any. > None, I think your proposal is a better name. Pushed that way. regards, tom lane