Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1errBH-00065d-Qw for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 20:21:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1errBG-000385-AK for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 20:21:26 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1errBG-00037v-3I for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 20:21:26 +0000 Received: from mail.thelabyrinth.net ([45.56.70.56]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1errBC-0003GG-P1 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2018 20:21:25 +0000 Received: from Davids-iMac.local (unknown [173.169.74.224]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dsteele) by mail.thelabyrinth.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DD6C54662; Fri, 2 Mar 2018 20:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions To: Robert Haas , Tomas Vondra Cc: Andres Freund , Peter Eisentraut , PostgreSQL Hackers References: <688b0b7f-2f6c-d827-c27b-216a8e3ea700@2ndquadrant.com> <5d00346a-b565-7fde-c6da-35f39c72936a@2ndquadrant.com> <4d7ed7b8-df43-9b79-b04e-ad4c43ef519c@2ndquadrant.com> <20180302011235.k7bxqmktrvgz5tpb@alap3.anarazel.de> From: David Steele Message-ID: <3061838d-2db6-eaef-6bc6-0091573afec8@pgmasters.net> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 15:21:19 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 3/2/18 3:06 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:33 PM, Tomas Vondra > wrote: >> Ah, apologies - that's due to moving the patch from the last CF (it was >> marked as RWF so I had to reopen it before moving it). I'll submit a new >> version of the patch shortly, please mark it as WOA until then. > > So, the way it's supposed to work is you resubmit the patch first and > then re-activate the CF entry. If you get to re-activate the CF entry > without actually updating the patch, and then submit the patch > afterwards, then the CF deadline becomes largely meaningless. I think > a new patch should rejected as untimely. Hmmm, I missed that implication last night. I'll mark this Returned with Feedback. Tomas, please move to the next CF once you have an updated patch. Thanks, -- -David david@pgmasters.net