Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jOlh2-0000FC-EK for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:19:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jOlh1-0001V0-9k for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:19:19 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jOlh1-0001UL-1y for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:19:19 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jOlgx-0004Rx-MS for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:19:18 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 03FHJ7kC030754; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:19:07 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Steven Pousty cc: Robert Haas , Pavel Stehule , Isaac Morland , Pierre Giraud , PostgreSQL Developers Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? In-reply-to: References: <8691.1586798003@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Steven Pousty message dated "Wed, 15 Apr 2020 10:10:59 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <30752.1586971147.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:19:07 -0400 Message-ID: <30753.1586971147@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Steven Pousty writes: > Is there a way to get a heavier line between each function? It would be > helpful to have a clearer demarcation of what belongs to each function. The first alternative I posted at https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/31833.1586817876%40sss.pgh.pa.us seems like it would accomplish that pretty well, by having lines *only* between functions. The last couple of things that have been posted seem way more cluttered than that one. regards, tom lane