Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d9IFj-0003WF-KY for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 May 2017 21:37:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d9IFj-00044W-63 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 May 2017 21:37:35 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d9IEE-00018G-Cj for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 12 May 2017 21:36:02 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d9IEB-0000lw-E8 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 12 May 2017 21:36:01 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v4CLZuLN030888; Fri, 12 May 2017 17:35:56 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Simon Riggs , Andrew Dunstan , Tomas Vondra , PostgreSQL-development , Dean Rasheed Subject: Re: WITH clause in CREATE STATISTICS In-reply-to: <20170512213010.i57j6ipolry75nnl@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20170512213010.i57j6ipolry75nnl@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Fri, 12 May 2017 18:30:10 -0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <30886.1494624956.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 17:35:56 -0400 Message-ID: <30887.1494624956@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Alvaro Herrera writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Oh, sorry --- I already pushed something about this. > That's fine, thanks. Oh, I see your patch also fixes missing code in getObjectDescription(). We need that. Is there a decent way to get the compiler to warn about that oversight? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers