Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gIb5H-0007C4-La for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 15:10:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gIb5F-0000z5-DG for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 15:10:01 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gIb5F-0000wO-2y for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 15:10:01 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gIb5C-0007VA-1U for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 15:09:59 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wA2F9s6s031040; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 11:09:54 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Daniel Gustafsson cc: Peter Eisentraut , Jakob Egger , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: PG vs macOS Mojave In-reply-to: <1CE1384A-7344-4405-A8C3-AF4C111DEF4D@yesql.se> References: <20840.1537850987@sss.pgh.pa.us> <29535.1539698523@sss.pgh.pa.us> <486.1539702831@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5BE313A1-1318-4A68-A183-5F60CA968CF1@eggerapps.at> <30776.1539786526@sss.pgh.pa.us> <687EAD19-E8F0-464C-9F2B-BE536B81985E@eggerapps.at> <2429.1539842651@sss.pgh.pa.us> <25039.1539874646@sss.pgh.pa.us> <11941.1541042255@sss.pgh.pa.us> <529860F6-243F-4B6F-B6D6-4376291D1593@yesql.se> <6712.1541081675@sss.pgh.pa.us> <8198.1541083983@sss.pgh.pa.us> <371F44FD-BCD0-4DD2-A261-346809E3CEE7@yesql.se> <4844.1541107036@sss.pgh.pa.us> <8164.1541110113@sss.pgh.pa.us> <8453.1541110417@sss.pgh.pa.us> <18304.1541169741@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1CE1384A-7344-4405-A8C3-AF4C111DEF4D@yesql.se> Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Gustafsson message dated "Fri, 02 Nov 2018 16:01:26 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <31038.1541171394.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 11:09:54 -0400 Message-ID: <31039.1541171394@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Daniel Gustafsson writes: >> On 2 Nov 2018, at 15:42, Tom Lane wrote: >> Anybody have an opinion about which approach to use? We need to choose >> one, and PDQ too, if we want full buildfarm coverage on it before Monday's >> wrap. > #1 is the option that appeals to me the most, mostly because it removes all > possible ambiguity of when/if it’s required compared to #2. I'm sort of leaning in that direction too, after sleeping on it. It's also closer to what we already shipped in 11.0 than #2 is. regards, tom lane