From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>,
 PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PQgetssl() and alternative SSL implementations
In-reply-to: <20140819161221.GI16422@tamriel.snowman.net>
References: <53F1E989.8020609@vmware.com>
 <20140819144841.GA16422@tamriel.snowman.net> <53F36B6E.6040105@vmware.com>
 <20140819154436.GD16422@tamriel.snowman.net>
 <20140819161000.GF6817@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org>
 <20140819161221.GI16422@tamriel.snowman.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
 message dated "Tue, 19 Aug 2014 12:12:21 -0400"
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 12:25:20 -0400
Message-ID: <31226.1408465520@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
>> Um, libpq has recently gained the ability to return result fragments,
>> right?  Those didn't exist when libpq-ification of odbc was attempted,
>> as I recall -- perhaps it's possible now.

> I was trying to remember off-hand if we still had that or not..  I
> thought there was discussion about removing it, actually, but perhaps
> that was something else.

Sure,
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/libpq-single-row-mode.html
That's a done deal, it won't be going away.

Whether it would solve ODBC's problem I don't know (and I'm not
volunteering to do the work ;-))

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers