From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
cc: YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
In-reply-to: <20151126164216.GA2521@awork2.anarazel.de>
References: <4184974.kkvGJ5GoEX@dinodell> <565714DB.3090806@timbira.com.br>
 <26660.1448554236@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3993879.VcJEeiShpZ@dinodell>
 <20151126164216.GA2521@awork2.anarazel.de>
Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
 message dated "Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:42:16 +0100"
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:50:01 -0500
Message-ID: <31305.1448556601@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2015-11-26 19:22:23 +0300, YUriy Zhuravlev wrote:
>> On Thursday 26 November 2015 11:10:36 you wrote:
>>> Adding a new build dependency is bad enough; adding one that isn't
>>> easily available is a show-stopper.

>> If someone decided to compile from source Postgres rather than install from 
>> RPM then it will not be a problem as to build CMake.

> Packages have to be built from something, and usually it's desirable
> that all dependencies are from within the distribution.

Yeah.  In particular, RPMs don't magically appear out of nowhere; somebody
has to build them, and more often than not, the somebody is subject to
distro packaging policy that says what build dependencies are allowed.

Red Hat certainly isn't ever going to ship a package that requires some
version of cmake that isn't what they ship in the particular distribution,
for example.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers