Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nv2pA-0004vb-Uh for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 28 May 2022 20:14:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nv2p9-0008AK-QM for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 28 May 2022 20:14:11 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nv2p9-0008AB-Gz for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 28 May 2022 20:14:11 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nv2p3-0002dX-LE for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 28 May 2022 20:14:09 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 24SKE1nC3131728; Sat, 28 May 2022 16:14:01 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andres Freund cc: Michael Paquier , Justin Pryzby , Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: pg_upgrade test writes to source directory In-reply-to: <20220528195949.tte5fukfr2z6xhrr@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <20220526205218.GC19626@telsasoft.com> <2464542.1653603596@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2480063.1653609068@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20220528195949.tte5fukfr2z6xhrr@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Andres Freund message dated "Sat, 28 May 2022 12:59:49 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3131726.1653768841.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 28 May 2022 16:14:01 -0400 Message-ID: <3131727.1653768841@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andres Freund writes: > I suspect there might be a bit more polish might be needed - that's why I > hadn't proposed the commit on its own yet. Yeah, I'd noticed the obsoleted comments too, but not bothered to complain since that was just WIP and not an officially proposed patch. I'll be happy to review if you want to put up a full patch. > I was also wondering about > proposing a different split (test data, test logs). Might be too invasive for back-patch. regards, tom lane