Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gv7Ig-0001t3-IN for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:15:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gv7If-0000Dg-A3 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:15:05 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gv7If-0000DY-2L for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:15:05 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gv7Ic-0004Rh-4V for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 21:15:04 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1GLEnXK031354; Sat, 16 Feb 2019 16:14:49 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Tomas Vondra cc: Merlin Moncure , Alvaro Herrera , Peter Eisentraut , Andrew Gierth , Michael Paquier , Robert Haas , Andreas Karlsson , Andres Freund , Thomas Munro , David Fetter , Pg Hackers Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs In-reply-to: References: <20190214160209.GA13250@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Tomas Vondra message dated "Fri, 15 Feb 2019 23:36:37 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <31352.1550351689.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 16:14:49 -0500 Message-ID: <31353.1550351689@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Tomas Vondra writes: > On 2/14/19 8:22 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:02 AM Alvaro Herrera >> wrote: >>> On 2019-Feb-14, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>>> If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a >>>> light vote for MATERIALIZED. It reads easier, seems more grammatically >>>> correct, and uses an existing word. >>> +1 for MATERIALIZED, as I proposed in >>> https://postgr.es/m/20170503173305.fetj4tz7kd56tjlr@alvherre.pgsql >> Seconded! > +1 to MATERIALIZED too I was expecting more controversy ... pushed that way. regards, tom lane