public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Chengpeng Yan <[email protected]>
To: Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: John Naylor <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Add a greedy join search algorithm to handle large join problems
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 13:04:11 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Hi,
> On Dec 2, 2025, at 18:56, Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I think a much broader evaluation will be needed, comparing not just the
> planning time, but also the quality of the final plan. Which for the
> starjoin tests does not really matter, as the plans are all equal in
> this regard.
Many thanks for your feedback.
You are absolutely right — plan quality is also very important. In my
initial email I only showed the improvements in planning time, but did
not provide results regarding plan quality. I will run tests on more
complex join scenarios, evaluating both planning time and plan quality.
Thanks again!
--
Best regards,
Chengpeng Yan
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Add a greedy join search algorithm to handle large join problems
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox