Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1oC6Ty-000702-Bz
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 21:34:50 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1oC6Tx-00011T-9D
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 21:34:49 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1oC6Tw-00011K-Vz
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 21:34:49 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1oC6Tu-0005BL-RL
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 21:34:47 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 26ELYg613153248;
	Thu, 14 Jul 2022 17:34:42 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
        Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
        Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: EINTR in ftruncate()
In-reply-to: 
 <CA+hUKGK2pLvUOM-EoRLQxL-fC5hFzi6Xa9za9hNmAf2DteVDFg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20220714144652.jph7exiywushg4gc@alvherre.pgsql>
 <2835511.1657812444@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+hUKGK2pLvUOM-EoRLQxL-fC5hFzi6Xa9za9hNmAf2DteVDFg@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
	message dated "Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:22:36 +1200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3153246.1657834482.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 17:34:42 -0400
Message-ID: <3153247.1657834482@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3153247.1657834482%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> So why would I add another wrapper like PG_SETMASK and leave it
> unimplemented for now on Windows, when I could just use sigprocmask()
> directly and leave it unimplemented for now on Windows?

Fair enough, I guess.  No objection to this patch.

(Someday we oughta go ahead and make our Windows signal API look more
like POSIX, as I suggested back in 2015.  I'm still not taking
point on that, though.)

			regards, tom lane