Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1mqLA3-0008BF-9Q
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:16:03 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1mqLA2-0000kt-67
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:16:02 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1mqLA1-0000kk-TS
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:16:01 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1mqL9z-0006RQ-B5
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:16:01 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1APKFnGh318312;
	Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:15:49 -0500
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
cc: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
        Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
        "Bossart,
    Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>,
        Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>,
        "masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com" <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>,
        "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org"
 <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
        "mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com" <mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com>,
        "Jakub.Wartak@tomtom.com" <Jakub.Wartak@tomtom.com>,
        Ryo Matsumura <matsumura.ryo@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: prevent immature WAL streaming
In-reply-to: <318012.1637871134@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <202111251958.z7xaqbby632w@alvherre.pgsql>
 <318012.1637871134@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	message dated "Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:12:14 -0500"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <318310.1637871349.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:15:49 -0500
Message-ID: <318311.1637871349@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/318311.1637871349%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

I wrote:
> However, this seems too forgiving:

... also, I don't know if you intended this already, but the
VerifyOverwriteContrecord change should only be applied in
back branches.  There's no need for it in HEAD.

			regards, tom lane