Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1w89dr-000GBG-2J for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2026 04:26:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1w89dq-003wLP-1R for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2026 04:26:50 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1w89dq-003wLG-0W for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2026 04:26:50 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1w89do-000000007ny-3LDg for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2026 04:26:49 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 6324QgEh3191453; Thu, 2 Apr 2026 00:26:42 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Thomas Munro cc: =?UTF-8?B?RGV2cmltIEfDvG5kw7x6?= , PostgreSQL Hackers , Matheus Alcantara , Anthonin Bonnefoy Subject: Re: LLVM 22 In-reply-to: References: <2805479.1775001311@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3184815.1775100697@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Munro message dated "Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:16:14 +1300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <3191451.1775104002.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:26:42 -0400 Message-ID: <3191452.1775104002@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Thomas Munro writes: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2026 at 4:31 PM Tom Lane wrote: >> Just out of curiosity: I see you back-patched that all the way, >> but midge had only been failing on v18 and HEAD. Were you just >> being defensive, or is there something deeper there? > It was failing locally for me on all branches. Ah, thanks for that detail. > I don't know why midge wasn't failing on 14-17. Could jit be disabled > somewhere secret? Aarch64 vs amd64, but this issue doesn't seem to be > architecture related, it's IR-level. Definitely not arch-specific, because I reproduced it on x86_64. midge's lack of failure is odd then, but I'm not sure it's worth expending a lot of brain cells on. regards, tom lane