Nitpicking code review for commit b15c1513:

+read_archive_wal_page(XLogDumpPrivate *privateInfo, XLogRecPtr targetPagePtr,
+                     Size count, char *readBuff)

I thought we agreed to stop using Size for new code?  size_t has been
around since C89.

Must have missed the memo :-(

+               pg_fatal("WAL segment \"%s\" in archive \"%s\" is too short: rea
d %lld of %lld bytes",
+                        fname, privateInfo->archive_name,
+                        (long long int) (count - nbytes),
+                        (long long int) count);

Why cast to long long int?  That's the sort of thing we used to have
to do for int64 (but no longer), but here it's size_t anyway.  %zu has
been around since C99.

will fix. Thanks for looking.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com