Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lMBTO-00035l-HV for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:19:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lMBTN-0006Ch-DV for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:19:05 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lMBTN-0006Ca-6i for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:19:05 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lMBTK-0002YP-F3 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:19:04 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 12GFIv8q3252102; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:18:57 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Justin Pryzby cc: Alvaro Herrera , Alexey Bashtanov , Franck Verrot , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Allow errors in parameter values to be reported during the BIND phase itself.. In-reply-to: <20210316011859.GC29463@telsasoft.com> References: <20210104170939.GH9712@telsasoft.com> <3087634.1615848349@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20210315224945.GB29463@telsasoft.com> <3140512.1615854618@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20210316011859.GC29463@telsasoft.com> Comments: In-reply-to Justin Pryzby message dated "Mon, 15 Mar 2021 20:18:59 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3252100.1615907937.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:18:57 -0400 Message-ID: <3252101.1615907937@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Justin Pryzby writes: > I think it's somewhat confusing that there's two callbacks. > The first one applies only during typinput/typreceive. > I guess the 2nd one should say that they're printed "in *future errors". I adjusted the comments to make this a bit clearer, and pushed it. regards, tom lane