From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
cc: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>,
 Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
        pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
        Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
        Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>,
        Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
        Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage
In-reply-to: 
 <CAFBsxsHnK5YAzvSVXo0=8kqrKt-OSHgDFDFVR0HTq-qADbJqJA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <295419.1659918447@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+hUKGK=N8W2uFPdJr07Rs4dgRtbzKaYvCaPQasX3S8=aTO5PQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <747620.1660002360@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+hUKG+L_3brvh=8e0BW_VfX9h7MtwgN=nFHP5o7X2oZucY9dg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGJdfTFtZXQ8P8CZtyx1k=mHcOD9savHVR2cjSSVp5Uirw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGLW6dWAJYQ4q1wXED78L_=tZp0LKi-BNjEaEnqfyWB4vw@mail.gmail.com>
 <360948.1660414060@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+hUKG+46-J6ALM65ka7ObG2=_zeMy1EyZDcY8QnENayfMzMqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGKErNfhmvb_H0UprEmp4LPzGN06yR2_0tYikjzB-2ECMw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGJZErt=_muvi3Q3_tc=nP2=SyZtBpx_-gWYwNZOcn2_EA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220825194729.5cgvx26ekbtmvjzg@awork3.anarazel.de>
 <CA+hUKG+a2mfK1ydpoLi2tnLZFZKq_kdB17F7fafFpb8aHETxZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <2923412.1661722825@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+hUKGJAgyWE4x94fz1BLqM0xogEujA7==Q-PQsfW9QByqYG4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALtqXTcb7baV39KODc+2xN4y_8794yDkrbcwi2y1SkGxUs7OEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFBsxsHnK5YAzvSVXo0=8kqrKt-OSHgDFDFVR0HTq-qADbJqJA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
	message dated "Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:11:48 +0700"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3265441.1663250120.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 09:55:20 -0400
Message-ID: <3265442.1663250120@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3265442.1663250120%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 3:11 PM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
>> The patch does not apply successfully; please rebase the patch.

> There's a good reason for that -- the latest one was committed two
> weeks ago. The status should still be waiting on author, though,
> namely for:

> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 5:28 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wr=
ote:
>> Remaining things from this thread:
>> * removing --disable-thread-safety
>> * removing those vestigial HAVE_XXX macros (one by one analysis and pat=
ches)
>> * making Unix sockets secure for Windows in tests

I imagine we should just close the current CF entry as committed.
There's no patch in existence for any of those TODO items, and
I didn't think one was imminent.

			regards, tom lane