Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u1eab-005sR6-1f for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2025 05:00:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u1eZb-00A2I9-2E for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2025 04:59:03 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u1eZa-00A2I0-Ou for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2025 04:59:03 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1u1eZZ-003P0W-07 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2025 04:59:02 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 5374wuZC3312150; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 00:58:56 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andrew Dunstan cc: vignesh C , Lars Kanis , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix build on MINGW on ARM64 In-reply-to: <4240b95b-b2e7-4db4-9174-77c2d8496170@dunslane.net> References: <300fab7e-b052-4fd2-8e42-15380b777ab3@dunslane.net> <91e3ec76-ac83-4c6b-8bec-3c7c346b4c8d@dunslane.net> <4240b95b-b2e7-4db4-9174-77c2d8496170@dunslane.net> Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Dunstan message dated "Tue, 01 Apr 2025 16:32:14 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3312148.1744001936.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:58:56 -0400 Message-ID: <3312149.1744001936@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andrew Dunstan writes: > On 2025-04-01 Tu 11:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> On 2025-04-01 Tu 8:47 AM, vignesh C wrote: >>> There is an existing CF entry for this at [1]. If no one picks this >>> till the end of this CF, we can move it to next CF. >>> [1] - https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5610/ >> Somehow I missed that. OK, looks good, will commit shortly. > Done fairywren has been failing rather horribly since this went in [1]. It's not certain of course that this commit broke it and not one of the other ones that first appeared in that build -- but none of the other ones look plausibly related. regards, tom lane [1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=3Dfairywren&dt= =3D2025-04-02%2007%3A06%3A04