Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p2FlH-0001jg-6G for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 18:00:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p2FlF-0005cx-Mi for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 18:00:13 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p2FlF-0005co-DU for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 18:00:13 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p2FlD-0005kb-CV for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 18:00:13 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 2B5I04k33323803; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 13:00:04 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Andrew Dunstan cc: Alvaro Herrera , Joe Conway , Robert Haas , Corey Huinker , Nikita Glukhov , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: Error-safe user functions In-reply-to: <85e40849-4458-bbb9-62ee-d9e7faf0c7dc@dunslane.net> References: <20221205174231.6wpmbuxafnfzlbuh@alvherre.pgsql> <85e40849-4458-bbb9-62ee-d9e7faf0c7dc@dunslane.net> Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Dunstan message dated "Mon, 05 Dec 2022 12:51:49 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3323801.1670263204.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 13:00:04 -0500 Message-ID: <3323802.1670263204@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andrew Dunstan writes: > Wait a minute! Oh, no, sorry, as you were, 'errsave' is fine. Seems like everybody's okay with errsave. I'll make a v2 in a little bit. I'd like to try updating array_in and/or record_in just to verify that indirection cases work okay, before we consider the design to be set. regards, tom lane