From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
        Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
        Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: EINTR in ftruncate()
In-reply-to: 
 <CA+hUKGKBWH5z04dDWXfofaSCxHBNteDqrOVu8GJQayUybrp1hA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20220714144652.jph7exiywushg4gc@alvherre.pgsql>
 <2835511.1657812444@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+hUKGK2pLvUOM-EoRLQxL-fC5hFzi6Xa9za9hNmAf2DteVDFg@mail.gmail.com>
 <3153247.1657834482@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+hUKGKBWH5z04dDWXfofaSCxHBNteDqrOVu8GJQayUybrp1hA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
	message dated "Fri, 15 Jul 2022 16:19:10 +1200"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3353396.1657891705.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:28:25 -0400
Message-ID: <3353397.1657891705@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3353397.1657891705%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 9:34 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> (Someday we oughta go ahead and make our Windows signal API look more
>> like POSIX, as I suggested back in 2015.  I'm still not taking
>> point on that, though.)

> For the sigprocmask() part, here's a patch that passes CI.  Only the
> SIG_SETMASK case is actually exercised by our current code, though.

Passes an eyeball check, but I can't actually test it.

			regards, tom lane