From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Does anyone ever use OPTIMIZER_DEBUG?
In-reply-to: <CAApHDvpzRrmzA2nv0N_ehMD1ajDQto+EpjLzfWoOW=qVu6eRRw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAApHDvoCdjo8Cu2zEZF4-AxWG-90S+pYXAnoDDa9J3xH-OrczQ@mail.gmail.com> <1104459.1695938385@sss.pgh.pa.us> <CAApHDvoMLP3ZpAE4_zivkT1GJU293BT7Yy-Kmo-kxU+Nc_-EWg@mail.gmail.com> <CAApHDvpzRrmzA2nv0N_ehMD1ajDQto+EpjLzfWoOW=qVu6eRRw@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
	message dated "Mon, 09 Oct 2023 10:26:38 +1300"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3363969.1696800505.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 17:28:25 -0400
Message-ID: <3363970.1696800505@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3363970.1696800505%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> It looks like nobody is objecting to this.  I understand that not
> everyone who might object will have read this email thread, so what I
> propose to do here is move along and just commit the patch to swap out
> debug_print_rel and use pprint instead.  If that's done now then there
> are around 10 months where we could realistically revert this again if
> someone were to come forward with an objection.

> Sound ok?

WFM.

			regards, tom lane