Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1izMUa-0004QW-Tf
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 15:21:29 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1izMUZ-00037h-NK
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 15:21:27 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1izMUZ-00035g-Ei
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 15:21:27 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1izMUX-0008Jx-82
	for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 15:21:27 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 015FLBW1003390;
	Wed, 5 Feb 2020 10:21:11 -0500
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
        Ian Barwick <ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com>,
        Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,
        Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com>,
        Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>,
        PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Add %x to PROMPT1 and PROMPT2
In-reply-to: 
 <CA+TgmoZp=wwSJ+f54G69ACXL77MRCO8j9OZhQo1NsaQ01=1cFQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <09502c40-cfe1-bb29-10f9-4b3fa7b2bbb2@2ndquadrant.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2001261946530.29788@pseudo>
 <e04078e8-ae4a-b09d-896d-5f2f5a042248@2ndquadrant.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2001271250190.24374@pseudo>
 <13bc9081-2cf8-bf99-bedb-ce70c82bebc8@2ndquadrant.com>
 <20200203070807.GD2180@paquier.xyz>
 <5E008326-2335-4FB2-8513-D9018EC94F02@yesql.se>
 <6749.1580740801@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <79ac1ca0-2bab-bbe4-126a-01966f812075@2ndquadrant.com>
 <20200204082036.GA94169@paquier.xyz>
 <CA+TgmoZp=wwSJ+f54G69ACXL77MRCO8j9OZhQo1NsaQ01=1cFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
	message dated "Wed, 05 Feb 2020 09:30:22 -0500"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3388.1580916071.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 10:21:11 -0500
Message-ID: <3389.1580916071@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Precedence: bulk

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm not really against this change but, given how long it's been the
> way that it is, I think we shouldn't make it without more plus votes.
> If we've actually got a broad consensus on it, sure, but I don't think
> 4 votes is a broad consensus.

Fair point.  I'm still abstaining, but maybe this should be proposed
on pgsql-general to try to get more opinions?

			regards, tom lane