Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vr7dG-0007l8-AY for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:52:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vr7dF-0004Mq-Of for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:52:53 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vr7dD-0004KL-7R for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:52:51 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vr7dA-0001Vj-S5 for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:52:50 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBCEqdjs003399; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:52:39 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Simon Riggs cc: Andres Freund , KONDO Mitsumasa , Pavel Stehule , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fabr=EDzio_Mello?= , Robert Haas , Pgsql Hackers Subject: Re: Time-Delayed Standbys In-reply-to: References: <52A59D10.7020209@lab.ntt.co.jp> <52A5A17D.5010504@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20131212110505.GA14510@alap2.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Simon Riggs message dated "Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:27:06 +0000" Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:52:39 -0500 Message-ID: <3398.1386859959@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org Simon Riggs writes: > On 12 December 2013 11:05, Andres Freund wrote: >>> My suggestion would be to add the TZ to the checkpoint record. This >>> way all users of WAL can see the TZ of the master and act accordingly. >>> I'll do a separate patch for that. >> Intuitively I'd say that might be useful - but I am not reall sure what >> for. And we don't exactly have a great interface for looking at a >> checkpoint's data. Maybe add it to the control file instead? > That's actually what I had in mind, I just phrased it badly in mid-thought. I don't think you realize what a can of worms that would be. There's no compact representation of "a timezone", unless you are only proposing to store the UTC offset; and frankly I'm not particularly seeing the point of that. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers