Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wB02G-000dpq-2i for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:47:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wB02F-008SYk-0I for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:47:47 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wB02E-008SYc-2b for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:47:47 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wB02D-00000000Glj-0qJv for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:47:47 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 63A0lb7w3439056; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 20:47:37 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Andreas Karlsson cc: Dapeng Wang , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: DOCS - Add introductory paragraph to Getting Started chapter In-reply-to: <20cde50b-fc2f-4eef-a295-07b70bc501dd@proxel.se> References: <1c36b321-63b8-4fa5-8e59-ca535cb0c31a@proxel.se> <20cde50b-fc2f-4eef-a295-07b70bc501dd@proxel.se> Comments: In-reply-to Andreas Karlsson message dated "Fri, 10 Apr 2026 02:40:33 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3439054.1775782057.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 20:47:37 -0400 Message-ID: <3439055.1775782057@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Andreas Karlsson writes: > On 4/10/26 2:36 AM, Dapeng Wang wrote: >> Thanks Andreas! Noted - I didn't have the original thread >> in my mailbox at the time, but I'm subscribed now so future >> replies will thread properly. > I see! Then the general recommendation is to use the re-send email > button in our mailing list archives. I know it was buggy some time ago > but I think it has been fixed now. Yeah, I use that all the time when I want to reply to some old thread that I no longer have locally. It's been flaky once or twice for me, but normally it works fine. A more pressing problem is that this iteration of the thread isn't attached to the CF entry; you need to do that so that it shows up as having current traffic. Right now, https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6506/ still shows the 19-Feb patch as current. regards, tom lane