Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps
 (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1oJbo0-0005NG-Uq
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 14:26:32 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-hackers-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1oJbnz-0003Ir-Mk
	for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 14:26:31 +0000
Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1oJbnz-0003CC-CP
	for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 14:26:31 +0000
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
	id 1oJbns-0004jm-V3; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 14:26:30 +0000
Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 274EQGhS3447874;
	Thu, 4 Aug 2022 10:26:16 -0400
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
cc: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>,
        Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>,
        Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
        Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
        Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>,
        "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
        Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
In-reply-to: 
 <CA+TgmoZkBcMi+Nikxfc54dgkWj41Q=Z4nuyHpheTcxA-qfS5Qg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20220730054401.GB3644221@rfd.leadboat.com>
 <351616.1659192034@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <635c8809-3525-7dae-a1a1-0d9069cd86bc@postgresql.org>
 <2657259.1659460333@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmoastyZUAmJ6t953=yycQxu_S0x6A08QVARsbOVAWW=D2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <c07d096c-a67a-9fb9-2001-7a97b36aa5a7@postgresql.org>
 <2686054.1659469199@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <98286e9b-8fe6-554e-c23f-d67a3df2c30d@postgresql.org>
 <2687956.1659469881@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmoYqSrO-dSP6up31gv5F+1-zM-5exjKw2BU6w+FtzAzNhA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220803202014.77m6z5m7v525p2b4@awork3.anarazel.de>
 <CA+TgmoYJaHNBghqALt-9FonK8FRB96m_MSNr9ev5EBto-2oMYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <3128525.1659559617@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAH2-WzkmNN0kwPBO8t=waOCikWM4KLX9fWEYyt2oyWP08u3mSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ddf43511-32fd-fc22-1b36-8e6c733a55b0@postgresql.org>
 <3260692.1659568781@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmoZkBcMi+Nikxfc54dgkWj41Q=Z4nuyHpheTcxA-qfS5Qg@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
	message dated "Thu, 04 Aug 2022 10:08:02 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3447872.1659623176.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 10:26:16 -0400
Message-ID: <3447873.1659623176@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Id: <pgsql-hackers.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3447873.1659623176%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> 100 << 2^32, so it's not terrible, but I'm honestly coming around to
> the view that we ought to just nuke this test case.

I'd hesitated to suggest that, but I think that's a fine solution.
Especially since we can always put it back in later if we think
of a more robust way.

			regards, tom lane