Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n4DIW-0006dV-Uv for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 02:42:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n4DIU-0003VK-QF for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 02:42:06 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n4DIU-0003Uf-H4 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 02:42:06 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n4DIO-00071N-2U for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 02:42:05 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 2032fr253461034; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 21:41:53 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Thomas Munro cc: Andres Freund , Dag Lem , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: daitch_mokotoff module In-reply-to: References: <0cac2d60-5b85-59c6-1ac1-77092b8688b7@enterprisedb.com> <20220102213150.y2tpuwqhruu5t2y5@alap3.anarazel.de> Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Munro message dated "Mon, 03 Jan 2022 14:47:05 +1300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <3461032.1641177713.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2022 21:41:53 -0500 Message-ID: <3461033.1641177713@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Thomas Munro writes: > Erm, it looks like something weird is happening somewhere in cfbot's > pipeline, because Dag's patch says: > +SELECT daitch_mokotoff('Straßburg'); > + daitch_mokotoff > +----------------- > + 294795 > +(1 row) ... so, that test case is guaranteed to fail in non-UTF8 encodings, I suppose? I wonder what the LANG environment is in that cfbot instance. (We do have methods for dealing with non-ASCII test cases, but I can't see that this patch is using any of them.) regards, tom lane