Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vFyuM-0051jX-UP for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:03:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vFyuL-007Hdt-Tu for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:03:56 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vFyuL-007Hdl-Jx for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:03:56 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vFyuI-005myo-1i for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:03:56 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 5A3I3po6349601; Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:03:51 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera cc: Pg Hackers , Daniel Verite Subject: Re: psql --help=variables missing csv_fieldsep In-reply-to: <202511031738.eqaeaedpx5cr@alvherre.pgsql> References: <202511031738.eqaeaedpx5cr@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera message dated "Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:44:31 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <349599.1762193031.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 13:03:51 -0500 Message-ID: <349600.1762193031@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk =3D?utf-8?Q?=3DC3=3D81lvaro?=3D Herrera writes: > While messing with the \pset boolean display patch, I noticed that psql > --help=3Dvariables is missing csv_fieldsep. Is there a reason for this? But wait ... is it actually a variable? help.c does list it, but as a \pset option: HELP0(" \\pset [NAME [VALUE]] set table output option\n" " (border|columns|csv_fieldsep|display_f= alse|display_true|\n" ... Some kind of mechanical cross-check does seem like a good idea, even if it's just a rough one-time effort. regards, tom lane