Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vjoWo-004kUZ-2P for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2026 01:02:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vjoWn-003xbf-1y for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2026 01:02:57 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vjoWn-003xbX-11 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2026 01:02:57 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vjoWk-0029VE-33 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2026 01:02:56 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 60P12iLR3497909; Sat, 24 Jan 2026 20:02:44 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Thomas Munro cc: Jacob Champion , =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro_Herrera?= , Michael Banck , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: Time to drop RADIUS support? In-reply-to: References: <202601231423.4522ubhwkcwj@alvherre.pgsql> <3112825.1769185807@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Munro message dated "Sun, 25 Jan 2026 12:14:19 +1300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3497907.1769302964.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2026 20:02:44 -0500 Message-ID: <3497908.1769302964@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Thomas Munro writes: > Great, it sounds like we have a plan. I think the wiki might be a > good place for that documentation. The details are likely to change, > and I wouldn't want to have to maintain that information in-tree, so I > created some PAM how-to documentation at > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/RADIUS after testing on Debian and > FreeBSD. Ok ... > We could point to that from the 19 release notes and in the > deprecation notice added to the documentation for 14-18, calling it > "community-maintained guidance on migration to supported > configurations". Do we need to keep any trace of this in the 19 docs, > and if so, where? A new tombstone section? I think we don't want https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/auth-radius.html to become 404, so I'd advocate keeping a short section with that SGML ID that says we no longer support RADIUS directly and gives a pointer to the wiki page. It probably doesn't belong exactly where it is today in the TOC, though, but shoved off in a corner somewhere. regards, tom lane