public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <[email protected]>
Cc: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
Cc: Japin Li <[email protected]>
Cc: Zsolt Parragi <[email protected]>
Cc: Euler Taveira <[email protected]>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: pg_get__*_ddl consolidation
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 07:55:02 -0400
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGECzQRyh9Yf87sMgBaYjaas7yx5R91ga5JjJxAx3W_Uu8BfUA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAN4CZFNYM5jNA_gLu9miAXg_7c8Z2zf-ePc+0rzidAV3CBs=cw@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<SY7PR01MB10921A6E1E08A48F3426FE529B651A@SY7PR01MB10921.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
	<CAKFQuwYcppypeGBwa7ZbDAfoUXSv+kLhJuAXsdwBmKrvy8wDFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAGECzQRyh9Yf87sMgBaYjaas7yx5R91ga5JjJxAx3W_Uu8BfUA@mail.gmail.com>


On 2026-04-05 Su 12:35 PM, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2026 at 17:06, Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Pushed. I have moved the remaining get_*_ddl items to PG20-1
> +1 on having  this feature in general. But I'm not sure I understand
> why it needs the whole bespoke string-based option parsing in the
> first commit. Why not use named arguments for this, i.e. have the
> usage syntax be:
>
> SELECT * FROM pg_get_role_ddl('regress_role_ddl_test3', pretty => true);
>
> Instead of the current:
>
> SELECT * FROM pg_get_role_ddl('regress_role_ddl_test3', 'pretty', 'true');


There was quite a deal of discussion around this mechanism. See Euler's 
review at [1] and follow-up at [2] for the original discussion of the 
VARIADIC option-parsing design and the use cases it was meant to 
address. I'm prepared to revisit it is there's a strong consensus on the 
point.


cheers


andrew



[1] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4e60bcae-8222-4e1f-8e5b-d73b59c93304%40app.fastmail.com 

[2] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4c695e76-5ab7-449f-8060-76518dd41468%40app.fastmail.com 


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com






view thread (31+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: pg_get__*_ddl consolidation
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox