Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1noay0-0005G9-8N for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 May 2022 01:16:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1noaxy-0004Lx-N3 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 May 2022 01:16:38 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1noaxy-0004Lg-EG for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 May 2022 01:16:38 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1noaxv-0004ws-UM; Wed, 11 May 2022 01:16:37 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 24B1GXbm035420; Tue, 10 May 2022 21:16:33 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: "Jonathan S. Katz" cc: Bruce Momjian , Justin Pryzby , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes In-reply-to: <745d3a6e-d766-8a63-0dc2-f88ae9ed4511@postgresql.org> References: <20220510180935.GB19626@telsasoft.com> <745d3a6e-d766-8a63-0dc2-f88ae9ed4511@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to "Jonathan S. Katz" message dated "Tue, 10 May 2022 20:14:28 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <35418.1652231793.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 21:16:33 -0400 Message-ID: <35419.1652231793@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk "Jonathan S. Katz" writes: > On 5/10/22 4:18 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > | Allow libpq's SSL private to be owned by the root user (David Steele) > This was backpatched to all supported versions[1]. While I'm a huge fan > of this behavior change for a plethora of reasons, I'm not sure if this > should be included as part of the PG15 release notes, given it's in the > 14.3 et al. It should not. However, the backpatch happened later than the commit to HEAD, and our git_changelog tool is not smart enough to match them up, so Bruce didn't see that there were followup commits. That's a generic hazard for major-release notes; if you spot any other cases please do mention them. regards, tom lane