Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oHBVS-00032x-Ec for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 21:57:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oHBVR-0001MP-8c for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 21:57:21 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oHBVQ-0001MG-VP for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 21:57:20 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oHBVO-00028N-FF for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 21:57:20 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 26SLvC1N3560220; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 17:57:12 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Matthias van de Meent cc: Alvaro Herrera , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion) In-reply-to: References: <20220720105049.jk52353p6ce35idb@alvherre.pgsql> <20220727185449.2ixbv3fe4mxuzpwk@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Matthias van de Meent message dated "Thu, 28 Jul 2022 20:04:38 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3560218.1659045432.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 17:57:12 -0400 Message-ID: <3560219.1659045432@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Matthias van de Meent writes: > I'd like to bring to your attention that the test that was introduced > with 9e4f914b seem to be flaky in FreeBSD 13 in the CFBot builds: it > sometimes times out while waiting for the secondary to catch up. Or, > at least I think it does, and I'm not too familiar with TAP failure > outputs: it returns with error code 29 and logs that I'd expect when > the timeout is reached. It's also failing in the buildfarm, eg https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=3Dconchuela&dt=3D2= 022-07-28%2020%3A57%3A50 Looks like only conchuela so far, reinforcing the idea that we're only seeing it on FreeBSD. I'd tentatively bet on a timing problem that requires some FreeBSD scheduling quirk to manifest; we've seen such quirks before. regards, tom lane