Subject: Re: pglz performance
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
References: <3c2d92d0-e715-f9ed-e1a7-3c510ed65940@2ndquadrant.com>
 <20191101154828.GA15829@alvherre.pgsql>
 <20191101165950.b5azncggaqfan5fi@development>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, Gasper Zejn <zejn@owca.info>,
 pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Organization: 2ndQuadrant
Message-ID: <35c2a448-06b8-eab0-05ea-34a3f51ba9a8@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:04:25 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191101165950.b5azncggaqfan5fi@development>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2019-11-01 17:59, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I'd try running the benchmarks to verify the numbers, and maybe do some
> additional tests, but it's not clear to me which patches should I use.
> 
> I think the last patches with 'hacked' and 'hacked8' in the name are a
> couple of months old, and the recent posts attach just a single patch.
> Andrey, can you post current versions of both patches?

OK, waiting on some independent verification of benchmark numbers.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services