From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
cc: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>,
        Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>,
        Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
        Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
        Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>,
        "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
        Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
In-reply-to: 
 <CA+TgmobeOarNkFDc+QJONkCwn_ZZyVgiwFmX7jRhdK1Rz-QW5w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20220730054401.GB3644221@rfd.leadboat.com>
 <351616.1659192034@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <635c8809-3525-7dae-a1a1-0d9069cd86bc@postgresql.org>
 <2657259.1659460333@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmoastyZUAmJ6t953=yycQxu_S0x6A08QVARsbOVAWW=D2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <c07d096c-a67a-9fb9-2001-7a97b36aa5a7@postgresql.org>
 <2686054.1659469199@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <98286e9b-8fe6-554e-c23f-d67a3df2c30d@postgresql.org>
 <2687956.1659469881@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmoYqSrO-dSP6up31gv5F+1-zM-5exjKw2BU6w+FtzAzNhA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220803202014.77m6z5m7v525p2b4@awork3.anarazel.de>
 <CA+TgmoYJaHNBghqALt-9FonK8FRB96m_MSNr9ev5EBto-2oMYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <3128525.1659559617@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAH2-WzkmNN0kwPBO8t=waOCikWM4KLX9fWEYyt2oyWP08u3mSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ddf43511-32fd-fc22-1b36-8e6c733a55b0@postgresql.org>
 <3260692.1659568781@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmoZkBcMi+Nikxfc54dgkWj41Q=Z4nuyHpheTcxA-qfS5Qg@mail.gmail.com>
 <3447873.1659623176@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmobVx8h=1MbOPTd8ctXUG1kYUTsSidPpNrmEJbqOS+98UQ@mail.gmail.com> <35731!
 76.1659635346@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CA+TgmobeOarNkFDc+QJONkCwn_ZZyVgiwFmX7jRhdK1Rz-QW5w@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
	message dated "Thu, 04 Aug 2022 15:02:10 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <3628088.1659640252.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 15:10:52 -0400
Message-ID: <3628089.1659640252@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3628089.1659640252%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I think the most practical alternative is to put this file back to the
> way it was before I started tinkering with it, and revisit this issue
> after the release.

Yeah, that seems like the right thing.  We are running too low on time
to have any confidence that a modified version of the test will be
reliable.

			regards, tom lane