pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
RPM maintainer?
5+ messages / 4 participants
[nested] [flat]

* RPM maintainer?
@ 1999-01-13 04:05  Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread

From: Clark Evans @ 1999-01-13 04:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-hackers@hub.org

I was wondering if any one is responsible for making 
the RPM for postgresql?  "rpm" could be added as a 
make target and the sources required to build the
rpm could be added to the CVS repository.  In this
way those people who only want binaries could be
better supported. 

I don't have a ton of time, but I could do it if
there arn't any other heads available. I'm currently
working on SGML integration and would rather spend
my time there... 

Clark



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [HACKERS] RPM maintainer?
@ 1999-01-13 06:04  Thomas G. Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
  parent: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread

From: Thomas G. Lockhart @ 1999-01-13 06:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>; +Cc: pgsql-hackers@hub.org

> I was wondering if any one is responsible for making
> the RPM for postgresql?  "rpm" could be added as a
> make target and the sources required to build the
> rpm could be added to the CVS repository.  In this
> way those people who only want binaries could be
> better supported.

That would be great. The RedHat folks are swamped with maintaining
*lots* of packages, and I'm sure it would help if we could do the
maintenance of the rpm for them.

Nobody else has stepped forward for that yet, though it has been a need
for a while. You're welcome to it ;)

Perhaps once the rpm build is codified, it would be easier for others to
help. I've got the rpm book, but have not waded through enough to figure
out how to build a from-scratch installation.

                     - Tom



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [HACKERS] RPM maintainer?
@ 1999-01-13 15:20  Brook Milligan <brook@trillium.NMSU.Edu>
  parent: Thomas G. Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread

From: Brook Milligan @ 1999-01-13 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu; +Cc: clark.evans@manhattanproject.com; pgsql-hackers@hub.org

   That would be great. The RedHat folks are swamped with maintaining
   *lots* of packages, and I'm sure it would help if we could do the
   maintenance of the rpm for them.

Does this mean that we should consider maintaining other packaging
systems, e.g., the pkg systems used by FreeBSD/NetBSD/... ?  I have no
idea if there is interest among the "normal" maintainers of those
things, but I suspect that like all of us they have too many things
going on also.

Cheers,
Brook



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [HACKERS] RPM maintainer?
@ 1999-01-13 15:42  Thomas G. Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
  parent: Brook Milligan <brook@trillium.NMSU.Edu>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread

From: Thomas G. Lockhart @ 1999-01-13 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Brook Milligan <brook@trillium.NMSU.Edu>; +Cc: clark.evans@manhattanproject.com; pgsql-hackers@hub.org

> Does this mean that we should consider maintaining other packaging
> systems, e.g., the pkg systems used by FreeBSD/NetBSD/... ?  I have no
> idea if there is interest among the "normal" maintainers of those
> things, but I suspect that like all of us they have too many things
> going on also.

I'm not certain about all of them, but for example someone (Oliver?)
maintains a Debian package for Postgres. Distribution packages are
always a good idea and helpful to some folks.

We have no normal maintainers in my experience. However, anyone
interested in maintaining packages would be welcome to join us as
another abnormal maintainer :)

                   - Tom



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [HACKERS] RPM maintainer?
@ 1999-01-14 20:06  aldev <alavoor@yahoo.com>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread

From: aldev @ 1999-01-14 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu; clark.evans@manhattanproject.com; pgsql-hackers

I can help in maintaining the RPMs for postgresql. Let me know.

al dev

You wrote:

> I was wondering if any one is responsible for making
> the RPM for postgresql?  "rpm" could be added as a
> make target and the sources required to build the
> rpm could be added to the CVS repository.  In this
> way those people who only want binaries could be
> better supported.

That would be great. The RedHat folks are swamped with maintaining
*lots* of packages, and I'm sure it would help if we could do the
maintenance of the rpm for them.

Nobody else has stepped forward for that yet, though it has been a need
for a while. You're welcome to it ;)

Perhaps once the rpm build is codified, it would be easier for others to

help. I've got the rpm book, but have not waded through enough to figure

out how to build a from-scratch installation.

                     - Tom






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~1999-01-14 20:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-01-13 04:05 RPM maintainer? Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
1999-01-13 06:04 ` Thomas G. Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
1999-01-13 15:20   ` Brook Milligan <brook@trillium.NMSU.Edu>
1999-01-13 15:42     ` Thomas G. Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
1999-01-14 20:06 Re: [HACKERS] RPM maintainer? aldev <alavoor@yahoo.com>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox