Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tRzTX-00D7jB-LL for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 20:01:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tRzTW-007el5-RU for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 20:01:22 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tRzTW-007ekw-HW for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 20:01:22 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tRzTU-00195I-2y for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 20:01:21 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4BTK1GK03701773; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 15:01:16 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Ronan Dunklau cc: Michael Paquier , pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Peter Eisentraut Subject: Re: Converting contrib SQL functions to new style In-reply-to: <3633307.1735498615@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <3395418.1618352794@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2345099.ElGaqSPkdT@aivenlaptop> <1400205.1734199200@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1471865.1734212070@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1493397.1734214099@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3633307.1735498615@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Sun, 29 Dec 2024 13:56:55 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3701771.1735502476.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 15:01:16 -0500 Message-ID: <3701772.1735502476@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk I wrote: > I reviewed and pushed these. Let's not forget that the pageinspect > one is still pending, though. We were waiting on Tomas' fix, which > is now pushed at 957ba9ff1, so I suppose it needs a rebase. Actually ... that one's quite trivial, so I went ahead and pushed it. The submitted patch had the functions as PARALLEL SAFE, but I think they have to remain PARALLEL RESTRICTED because they use tuple_data_split(), cf pageinspect--1.10--1.11.sql. regards, tom lane