From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Postgres perl module namespace
In-reply-to: <1290c0d8-f619-0fa2-7c2f-8077ad967bbc@dunslane.net>
References: <aede93a4-7d92-ef26-398f-5094944c2504@dunslane.net>
 <3796296.1621545509@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <1290c0d8-f619-0fa2-7c2f-8077ad967bbc@dunslane.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
	message dated "Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:10:56 -0400"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-ID: <3784120.1628606443.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:40:43 -0400
Message-ID: <3784121.1628606443@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3784121.1628606443%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I will undertake to do the work, once we get the bike-shedding part done.

> I'll kick that off by suggesting we move all of these to the namespace
> PgTest, and rename TestLib to Utils, so instead of
>     use TestLib;
>     use PostgresNode;
> you would say
>     use PgTest::Utils;
>     use PgTest::PostgresNode;

Using both "Pg" and "Postgres" seems a bit inconsistent.
Maybe "PgTest::PgNode"?

More generally, I've never thought that "Node" was a great name
here; it's a very vague term.  While we're renaming, maybe we
could change it to "PgTest::PgCluster" or the like?

			regards, tom lane