Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vTGZa-00FnC1-0q for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 09:33:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vTGZX-00AOfb-2F for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 09:33:24 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vTGZX-00AOfT-0w for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 09:33:23 +0000 Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se ([93.188.3.37]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vTGZU-0046aQ-20 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 09:33:22 +0000 Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C331A4BFEEC for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:33:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from s981.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3434C024A; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:33:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from s473.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s981.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95F922B177F; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:33:16 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: s473.loopia.se (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yesql.se Received: from s899.loopia.se ([172.22.191.5]) by s473.loopia.se (s473.loopia.se [172.22.190.13]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id FuyLIlO93mc0; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:33:16 +0100 (CET) X-Loopia-Auth: user X-Loopia-User: daniel@yesql.se X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 89.255.232.236 Received: from smtpclient.apple (customer-89-255-232-236.stosn.net [89.255.232.236]) (Authenticated sender: daniel@yesql.se) by s899.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CF3F2C8BA5B; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:33:16 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yesql.se; s=loopiadkim1707475645; t=1765359196; bh=Yxh5f0CZm90JzaEJAamOz6cr7lUUwdyqW8b8M7wkZkY=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=wDSP/N0FSRr2teVQPBMlVyzeHivyKgjfuV9Rkri9S3jKo1INFcKl5m9pc7g2pRyC1 IVeEq0Iloa55iE5y1ikRlPPs+i9jh1Ih4Wt4978sRT+lVq+M/M/E6gj4+jBKQN+OUM Gyg2EahPGM9UFYGpb77vhENDWjBJ2DFW+7QelzcBTZx+GVP+Tn0gOM+pHGxOM+OnWs pSJRWGussgPwQSDlLfAMfkSpE/rNIqs5wyeCJLtGQ2slbyC7EgvZwOaON85Q6eaxPz WgWNKu6pDZeEK8gb6RFXE+l/YDipnMtLlZmDOe+qaqi+oSMV4HuEHZqYPM3BqNw4bW XMycQl60yf9AQ== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.2\)) Subject: Re: updates for handling optional argument in system functions From: Daniel Gustafsson In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:33:05 +0100 Cc: Pgsql Hackers Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <380E3FBB-93AD-4EF4-B380-DAFC9CFE2757@yesql.se> References: To: Mark Wong X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51.11.2) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk > On 10 Dec 2025, at 00:28, Mark Wong wrote: > Is that something we want? I have yet to study the patch, but conceptually I am favour of this. I find reading the code is easier when it's done this way. -- Daniel Gustafsson