Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rmZrX-008huT-9v for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:50:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rmZrV-00EhKP-JE for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:50:42 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rmZrV-00EhJn-8y for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:50:41 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rmZrS-005KLP-5y for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:50:40 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 42JDoaeZ3813153; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:50:36 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Daniel Gustafsson cc: Laurenz Albe , Robert Haas , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: documentation structure In-reply-to: References: <4385545ed373daf0cf08abb6644caf6315a1ca71.camel@cybertec.at> Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Gustafsson message dated "Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:05:46 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3813151.1710856236.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:50:36 -0400 Message-ID: <3813152.1710856236@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Daniel Gustafsson writes: > It's actually not very odd, the reference section is using e= lements > and we had missed the arabic numerals setting on those. The attached fi= xes > that for me. That being said, we've had roman numerals for the referenc= e > section since forever (all the way down to the 7.2 docs online has it) s= o maybe > it was intentional? I'm quite sure it *was* intentional. Maybe it was a bad idea, but it's not that way simply because nobody thought about it. regards, tom lane