Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ7Is-0003wN-2u for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:43:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ7Iq-0007mI-8U for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:43:16 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ7Iq-0007mA-1P for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:43:16 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJ7In-0000bM-UC for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:43:15 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08I3h9Of381871; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 23:43:09 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: "Tharakan, Robins" cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" , "Massey, Sean" Subject: Re: track_planning causing performance regression In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to "Tharakan, Robins" message dated "Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:55:04 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <381869.1600400589.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 23:43:09 -0400 Message-ID: <381870.1600400589@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk "Tharakan, Robins" writes: >> During fully-cached SELECT-only test using pgbench, Postgres v13Beta1 >> shows ~45% performance drop [2] at high DB connection counts (when >> compared with v12.3) > It'd be great if we could also give credit to "Sean Massey" for this find. I poked through my Postgres inbox, and couldn't find any previous mail from or mentioning a Sean Massey. While there's not much of a formal policy around this, we usually limit ourselves to crediting people who have directly interacted with the PG community. I'm aware that there's more than a few cases where someone talks to the community on behalf of a company-internal team ... but since we have little visibility into such situations, whoever's doing the talking gets all the credit. Given that background, it seems like crediting Sean here would be slightly unfair special treatment. I'd encourage him to join the mailing lists and be part of the community directly --- then we'll definitely know what he's contributed. regards, tom lane