Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uYmbX-00BK1V-3E for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2025 14:13:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uYmbS-002dtj-OT for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2025 14:13:55 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uYmbS-002dtM-C3 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2025 14:13:55 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uYmbR-0063BH-0M for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2025 14:13:53 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 567EDlt2387477; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 10:13:47 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz cc: Peter Eisentraut , Andrew Dunstan , Michael Paquier , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: C11 / VS 2019 In-reply-to: References: <01a69441-af54-4822-891b-ca28e05b215a@eisentraut.org> <90506.1751754464@sss.pgh.pa.us> <46154df9-f514-4d79-89bb-df4af46b1b9f@eisentraut.org> Comments: In-reply-to Nazir Bilal Yavuz message dated "Mon, 07 Jul 2025 16:19:39 +0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <387475.1751897627.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 10:13:47 -0400 Message-ID: <387476.1751897627@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Nazir Bilal Yavuz writes: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 at 13:51, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Hmm. We have the (allegedly) same VS version in Cirrus CI, and it's >> never shown a problem like this. > CI uses the latest VS 2019 (v16.11.48), it looks like buildfarm member > drongo uses VS 2019 v16.3.1. I created a custom Windows VM with the > same VS 2019 version (v16.3.1) at the drongo and CI failed with the > same error [1]. Huh. Can we trawl the release notes for VS and see if this was acknowledged as a bug fix, and if so when did it happen? I think whether we can say "get a newer compiler" depends in part on how long it's been fixed. regards, tom lane